March 12, 2025

Non-Destructive Testing of Warehouse Foundations: A Case Study

Using ultrasonic pulse velocity to assess concrete integrity

Summary

How ultrasonic pulse velocity testing revealed hidden voids in a 20-year-old warehouse slab.

This case study examines a 20-year-old warehouse foundation where surface cracks raised concerns about structural safety. Our team deployed ultrasonic pulse velocity (UPV) testing across 120 grid points, identifying three distinct zones with reduced wave propagation speeds. Core samples from those zones confirmed honeycombing and micro-cracking due to alkali-silica reaction.

The report details the testing protocol, data interpretation, and the resulting targeted repair strategy that saved the client 40% compared to full slab replacement.

Testing Protocol

UPV measurements were taken on a 1.5-meter grid pattern covering the entire 2,700 m² slab. Transducers were coupled to the surface using petroleum jelly, and each reading was repeated three times to ensure repeatability. A total of 120 grid points were surveyed over two days.

Data Interpretation

Wave speeds below 3,500 m/s were flagged as anomalous. Three zones—totaling roughly 180 m²—showed average velocities of 2,900–3,200 m/s. Core extraction from those areas confirmed the presence of honeycombing and ASR gel. Zones with velocities above 4,000 m/s corresponded to sound concrete.

Repair Strategy

Rather than replacing the entire slab, the client opted for targeted removal and replacement of the affected zones, combined with surface sealers to mitigate further ASR progression. The approach reduced costs by approximately 40% and minimized operational downtime.

David Krasovic, P.E.

Senior Structural Engineer — Concrete Materials & Forensics

Licensed professional engineer with 18 years in structural diagnostics and materials testing. Leads Advacore’s core drilling and load assessment team for commercial and industrial projects.

Core Drilling Analysis for Commercial Building Load Assessments

From sample extraction to compliance reporting

Core drilling remains the gold standard for verifying in-situ concrete strength. This article covers the complete workflow: sample extraction with diamond-tipped coring bits, laboratory compressive strength testing, and petrographic analysis for aggregate distribution.

We present data from a 12-story commercial building where core tests revealed a 15% strength deficit in upper-floor columns. The analysis led to a revised structural load plan and a targeted carbon-fiber wrapping retrofit. Compliance reporting requirements per ACI 318 are also outlined.

The extraction phase used 100 mm diameter diamond-tipped bits with continuous water cooling to minimize micro-cracking. Each core was logged for depth, orientation, and visible defects before being transported in sealed, padded containers. Laboratory testing followed ASTM C42 procedures, with moisture conditioning and end-grinding prior to compressive loading.

Petrographic examination of thin sections from the upper-floor cores showed uneven aggregate distribution and localized voids — consistent with poor consolidation during original placement. The 15% strength deficit compared to design specifications triggered a full structural reassessment. Our team modeled the reduced capacity and identified six columns requiring retrofit. Carbon-fiber wrapping was selected for its minimal added weight and rapid installation.

The final compliance report included core logs, stress-strain curves, petrographic micrographs, and a signed statement of findings per ACI 318-19 Section 5.6.5. The building owner submitted the report to the local building authority, and the retrofit was completed within the project schedule.

Published under the technical coordination of Advacore — Structural Concrete Integrity Audits

Cookie settings

We use cookies to keep the site reliable, remember basic choices, and understand which pages are useful. You can accept, reject, or review the settings before continuing.